Measure twice, clone once. That’s the secret to Eli Review clones with due dates that make sense in the new term: Measure the days between start date and first due date in the original course. Subtract the days from the first due date in the clone to set the start date. Clone. Check your Instructor […]
Read More
For the past five years, Eli Review has partnered with San Francisco State University to build a community of practice around peer learning in first-year writing, second year writing, and writing in the disciplines. Our partnership includes more than 30 recorded online office hours where instructors discuss one aspect of teaching feedback and revision each […]
Read More
This week, I’ll be speaking at the Public Philosophy Network conference where I’m going to talk about the concept of formative peer review. For an academic audience, the idea of review with the aim not to evaluate and qualify or reject work but to make the writing (and the writer!) better is…well…a little bit novel. […]
Read MoreWe hear instructors offer all kinds of reasons for using Eli Review for peer feedback and revision in their classes: their LMS tools disappoint; their students like the app’s ease of use; they like being able to see all the comments and revision plans; they like our pedagogical resources; they like our team. But, Jessica […]
Read More
In Eli Review, writers can rate the feedback they received from peers. Helpfulness ratings let reviewers and the instructor know if writers are getting that they need to revise. Like Amazon’s rating system and other reputation systems, helpfulness ratings are most useful when participants share common expectations for high and low ratings. In our student […]
Read More
