So already we're about 40 percent done with this review
and I have 51 comments
from reviewers to writers
look it and I can see just
just by scanning those I see patterns start to emerge.
So one at that the we'll be talking about in just a minute
is a pattern that a lot on the writers are already
is a common problem that they're wrestling
with, which is what should the overarching
framework be for presenting this
nutrition information so that when they walk into a
fast food restaurant they can relate terms like
fats and carbohydrates to what they see on the menu. That particular comment or something
like that comment - I've seen about six or eight times so
it looks something like "how can you help kids identify when
they're making choices because those menu items may not tell them what's in the food
or how we help them know if they have the right proportions
in a happy meal or something like that.
Coming out the review this will be one of our key
conversations to have before we leave because it's shared across
so many different people. So this comment earns my endorsement because
it specifically talks about how to improve a definition and that's the
focus of today's review
and I'll go back to remind them that that's really what we're focusing on
today
so it if it was just a general
piece of feedback that's good like it pointed out an
inaccuracy factually I might not actually endorse it today
because while those things are important maybe in the final draft they're not the
focus is what we're doing today.
But today anything that's going to be zeroed in on giving better definition
and offers constructive criticism
I'm going give a thumbs-up to.